At least in art, expression requires a medium, a medium that is recalcitrant and that artists must bend to their will. When throwing things to express anger,. With boring predictability, almost all contemporary art discussors fall into a “relative gap”, in which they do their best to demonstrate how open they are and how unavoidably lax the concept of art is. Artistic periods such as classical, Byzantine, neoclassical, romantic, modern and postmodern reflect the changing nature of art in social and cultural contexts; and changing values are evident in the different contents, forms and styles.
Art doesn't have to produce beautiful objects or events, since a great work of art can validly awaken emotions other than those awakened by beauty, such as terror, anxiety or laughter. Art as a representation of external existence (it is true that “seen through temperament”) has been replaced by art as an expression of the inner life of human beings. Sufficiency for something to be art requires a meaning for art lovers, which endures as long as the samples or types of the work of art persist. So where does the subjective notion that beauty can still be found in art lie? If beauty is the result of a process by which art gives pleasure to our senses, then it must remain a matter of personal discernment, even if outside forces cry out to take control of the same.
These influences must contribute to a culture's understanding of what art is at any time, making ideas about art dependent on culture. The stratification of art according to its value and the resulting tension also increases its meaning, and the meaning of art for society. At this point, the obvious recognition of what art really is is implicit; in other words, the author doesn't have to tell you that it is art when, otherwise, you would have no idea. Art promotes the development of a civilization, since it supports the established system and also prevents subversive messages from being silenced: art promotes, reflects and reveals change in politics and morality.
Identifying instances of art is relatively simple, but a definition of art that includes all possible cases is difficult to achieve. Despite opposing theories, it can be considered that works of art have “family similarities” or “traits of resemblance” that link very different artistic instances. The answer to the question could, perhaps, be found in Berys Gaut's criteria for deciding if an artifact is, in fact, art, that is, if works of art work only as pieces of art, as intended by their creators. But because it was the subject of debate in the art world, it managed to break into the art world, and today it is considered art, and Odell he is considered an artist.
The fundamental difference between art and beauty is that art is about who produced it, while beauty depends on who looks at it.
